This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Röder, C. Articles by Busato, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Röder, C. Articles by Busato, A.

The validity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of loosening of components in total hip arthroplasty

¹ Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Berne, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008 Berne, Switzerland.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Berne, Inselspital, 3008 Berne, Switzerland.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, 681 Pine Avenue W., RVH Suite S 9.30, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. Busato.

We analysed follow-up data from 18 486 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 1967 and 2001 to assess the validity of clinical procedures in diagnosing loosening of prosthetic components. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were estimated with the radiological definition of loose or not loose as the ‘gold standard’.

The prevalence of acetabular loosening increased from 0.6% to 13.9% during the period of the study and that of femoral loosening from 0.9% to 12.1%. Sensitivities and positive predictive values were low, suggesting that clinical procedures could not replace radiological assessment in the identification of loose prostheses. Specificities and negative predictive values were constantly above 0.86. The possibility of there being a prosthesis which is not loose in asymptomatic patients was consequently very high, particularly during the first five to six years after operation.

The necessity of periodic clinical and radiological follow-up examinations of asymptomatic patients during the first five to six years after operation remains questionable. Symptomatic patients, however, require radiological assessment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Reinartz, T. Mumme, B. Hermanns, U. Cremerius, D. C. Wirtz, W. M. Schaefer, F.-U. Niethard, and U. Buell Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS TRIPLE-PHASE BONE SCANNING J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]