Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue 1, 57-61.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.13239  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barr, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barr, V.

Arthrodesis of the knee using a custom-made intramedullary coupled device

S. P. White, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow; A. J. Porteous, FRCS, (Trauma & Orth), Specialist Orthopaedic Registrar; and J. H. Newman, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK.

W. Mintowt-Czyz, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; and V. Barr, MRCS, Senior House Officer

Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport NP20 2UB, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr S. P. White at 55 Dongola Road, Bristol BS7 9HW, UK.

Nine patients underwent arthrodesis of the knee using a customised coupled nail (the Mayday arthrodesis nail), five after infected arthroplasty, one following failed arthrodesis, one for intractable anterior knee pain, one for Charcot instability and one after trauma. Comparison was made with 17 arthrodeses, eight undertaken using external fixation, four with dual compression plates, and five with long Küntscher nails. Union was achieved in all patients (100%) at a mean time of ten months using the customised implant. There were no complications despite early weight-bearing. No further procedures were required. This contrasted with a rate of union of 53% and a complication rate of 76% with alternative techniques. Of this second group, 76% required a further operative procedure.

We compared the Mayday arthrodesis nail with other techniques of arthrodesis of the knee. The differences in the need for further surgery and occurrence of complications were statistically significant (p < 0.001), and differences in the rate of nonunion and inpatient stay of less than three weeks were also significant (p < 0.05) using Fisher’s exact test.

We conclude that a customised coupled intramedullary nail can give excellent stability allowing early weight-bearing, and results in a high rate of union with minimal postoperative complications.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General