This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Misra, A. N. Articles by Newton, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Misra, A. N. Articles by Newton, G.

The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement

The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr A. N. Misra at D-3 Ambabari, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

We randomised 129 knees which were to be replaced using a standard posterior-cruciate-ligament (PCL)-retaining cemented total knee replacement into two groups. In one the PCL was retained in the normal way and in the other it was resected. They were well matched, with a predominance of women, and a mean age of 67 years.

There was no statistically significant difference in the Hospital for Special Surgery scores at a mean of 57 months (56 to 60) between the two groups although 21 patients (24 knees) were lost to follow-up. Relief from pain, correction of deformity, range of movement, stability and strength were comparable in both. Radiological assessment showed femoral rollback in approximately 20% of knees with a slightly higher incidence in the PCL-resected group. There was no significant loosening detected in either group at review at two years.

At five years, one knee in the PCL-retained group had been revised because of infection and one patient in each group was awaiting revision for loosening.

Our findings have shown no significant difference in the five-year results for a PCL-retaining total knee replacement if the PCL is excised or preserved. This suggests two important points. First, the PCL is not functional in most patients with a total knee replacement even when retained. Secondly, patients with an excised PCL show a good result with a PCL-retaining implant, thereby questioning the need for a posterior stabilised design in such a situation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Christen, P. V. Heesterbeek, A. Wymenga, and U. Wehrli Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee replacement: THE QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIGHTNESS OF THE FLEXION GAP AND TIBIAL TRANSLATION J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2007; 89-B(8): 1046 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Shannon, J. J. Cronin, M. S. Cleary, S. J. Eustace, and J. M. O'Byrne The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we 'preserve' it?: A RADIOLOGICAL STUDY J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2007; 89-B(6): 766 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]