This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lykke, N. Articles by Thorngren, K.-G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lykke, N. Articles by Thorngren, K.-G.

Fixation of fractures of the femoral neck

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED TRIAL OF THREE ULLEVAAL HIP SCREWS VERSUS TWO HANSSON HOOK-PINS

Department of Surgery, Aker University Hospital, Tronheimsveien 235, 0514 Oslo, Norway.

K.-G. Thorngren, MD, PhD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Lund University Hospital, SE-22185, Lund, Sweden.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr N. Lykke at Ullevaal Universitessykehus, Pastikkirurgisk Avdeling, N-0407 Oslo, Norway.

In a prospective, randomised trial, we compared the use of three Ullevaal hip screws with that of two Hansson hook-pins in 278 patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Background factors were similar in both groups. Follow-up was for two years.

There were no significant differences between the groups in length of time of surgery, hospital stay, general complications, mortality, pain or walking ability. Likewise, the rates of early failure of fixation, nonunion, and the need for reoperation did not differ significantly between the groups. The use of hook-pins was associated with less drill penetrations of the femoral head during surgery (odds ratio 2.6, p= 0.05) and a lower incidence of necrosis of the femoral head (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.04). There was a strong relationship between poor reduction and fixation of the fracture and subsequent reoperation (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Likewise, peroperative drill penetration of the femoral head was associated with a greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.038). Both methods gave favourable results. In total, 22% of the patients needed a major reoperation (usually hemiarthroplasty), while in 7% of the cases the fixation device needed to be removed. Osteosynthesis as the sole method for operation of all fractures of the femoral neck was thus successful in 78% of patients. With selective treatment most of the remaining patients would have benefited if treated by a primary arthroplasty. Accurate selection requires the development of better prognostic methods.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Gurusamy, M. J. Parker, and T. K. Rowlands The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: THE EFFECT OF SCREW POSITIONING AND ANGULATION ON FRACTURE HEALING J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2005; 87-B(5): 632 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]