Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue 4, 531-534.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.13767  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, H.

The influence of early ambulation and other factors on headache after lumbar myelography

Y. Murata, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon; M. Yamagata, MD, PhD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; S. Ogata, MD, PhD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; K. Shimizu, MD, PhD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; Y. Ikeda, MD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; J. Hirayama, MD, PhD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; and H. Yamada, MD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Chiba University and Chiba Rosai Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr Y. Murata at the Department of Orthopaedics, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ru, Chiba City, Japan.

In order to determine the influence of early ambulation and other factors on headaches occurring after lumbar myelography we randomised 207 patients (127 men and 80 women) into two groups. Following the investigation, we allowed the 101 patients (65 men and 36 women) in group A to sit or stand freely, while we confined the 106 patients (62 men and 44 women) in group B to bed for 20 hours. The nine patients in group B who could not maintain bed rest were excluded.

There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards the prevalence of spinal headache (8.9% in group A v 14.4% in group B). Patients who reported headaches, however, were significantly more likely to be women (18.7%) than men (7.3%), be younger (mean age 45 years v 56 years), have a higher cerebrospinal pressure before removal of fluid (mean values 172 v 137 mm H2O) and a lower systolic (mean values 120 v 134 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure.

We conclude that, although other factors may be associated with headaches, late ambulation is not effective in preventing spinal headaches after lumbar myelography.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General