Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue 4, 554-558.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.13858  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daigeler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daigeler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, W.

Orthotopic and heterotopic lower leg reimplantation

EVALUATION OF SEVEN PATIENTS

A. Daigeler, MD, Resident; H. Fansa, MD, Senior Attending Surgeon; and W. Schneider, MD, Chief of service

Klinik für Plastische, Wiederherstellungs- und Handchirurgie, der Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr H. Fansa.

Reimplantation is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. This is especially so after amputation of the upper limb since prostheses provide limited function. In unilateral amputation of the lower leg orthotopic reimplantation is the treatment of choice. With bilateral amputation, in which orthotopic reimplantation is not possible because of the complexity of the trauma, heterotopic reimplantation is an option.

We report five patients who received orthotopic and two who received heterotopic reimplantations of the lower leg. We assessed the functional outcome with reference to cutaneous sensation, mobility, pain, and the cosmetic result.

The functional outcome was good, as was the patients’ satisfaction. Their mobility, stability, and psychological state were satisfactory. Patients with heterotopic reimplantations preferred the reimplanted leg to a prosthesis. Although reimplantation of the lower leg requires prolonged hospitalisation, delayed mobilisation and secondary operations, we conclude that there is an indication for this operation in order to improve the patient’s quality of life.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General