Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue 6, 802-808.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B6.14216  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rapley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rapley, P.

Reconstruction for chronic dislocation of the hip

H. Hamilton, FRCS (C), Orthopaedic Surgeon

The Port Arthur Clinic, 194 North Court Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7A 4V7, Canada.

T. Fung, PhD, Senior Statistical Consultant

Information Technologies, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.

P. Rapley, PhD, Medical Physicist

Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, 290 Munro Street, Thunder, Bay, Ontario P7A 7T1, Canada.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr H. Hamilton.

We analysed one surgeon’s attempt to reconstruct the hip in 66 patients (84 hips) with chronic dislocation and to restore the height of the centre of rotation above the transverse teardrop line, the bodyweight lever arm, the abductor lever arm, and the abductor angle to normal. The outcome was assessed using a patient profile at 0, 10 and 20 years, a clinical assessment of pain, mobility and the range of active movement. We measured the work done by active movement against gravity, radiological signs of loosening, migration and subsidence, and the need for revision. We used survival at ten years and revision as the endpoint.

The incidence of complications was higher than in arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the hip, but the outcome was considered satisfactory. The advantages of a flanged cemented socket were demonstrated. A custom-made, laterally reduced, Charnley extra small CDH femoral prosthesis was used in certain cases.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General