Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue 8, 1107-1113.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B8.14282  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorotka, R.
Right arrow Articles by Buchinger, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorotka, R.
Right arrow Articles by Buchinger, W.

The influence of immediate surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures on mortality and quality of life

OPERATION WITHIN SIX HOURS OF THE FRACTURE VERSUS LATER THAN SIX HOURS

R. Dorotka, MD, Resident1; H. Schoechtner, MD, Resident2; and W. Buchinger, MD, Head of Department1

1 Department of Traumatology
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Waldviertelklinik Horn, A-3580 Horn, Austria.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr R. Dorotka at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

We compared the mortality and outcome of 182 patients with proximal fractures of the femur after immediate and delayed surgical treatment. Seventy-nine patients were operated upon within six hours of the fracture (group 1) and 103 patients were operated upon after this period of time (group 2).

At six months follow-up, group 1 had a significantly lower mortality rate. There was a good outcome in both groups with no differences in the outcome. Neither surgical nor anaesthetic factors appeared to have influenced mortality. The subdivision of groups revealed that patients operated on within 24 hours had a better outcome than those whose surgery was delayed.

Although there may have been a bias, as patients were not randomly assigned to immediate or delayed surgical treatment, the data suggest that early stabilisation may be associated with a lower mortality rate. Even with pre-clinical delays of more than six hours early treatment should still be attempted, as better results seem to be achieved after 24 hours compared to a later time in our patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. W. Siegmeth, K. Gurusamy, and M. J. Parker
Delay to surgery prolongs hospital stay in patients with fractures of the proximal femur
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1123 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
I. Weller, E. K. Wai, S. Jaglal, and H. J. Kreder
The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 361 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General