Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 1, 48-53.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B1.14091  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolishGerman
Right arrow Korean
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stamatis, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Myerson, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stamatis, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Myerson, M. S.

Treatment of recurrence of symptoms after excision of an interdigital neuroma

A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

E. D. Stamatis, MD, Fellow; and M. S. Myerson, MD, Attending Surgeon

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Union Memorial Hospital, #400, 3333 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.

Correspondence should be sent to L. Camire at Union Memorial Orthopaedics, The Johnston Professional Building, #400, 3333 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.

During a six-year period (January 1996 to January 2002 ), we re-explored 60 interspaces (49 patients, 49 feet) for recurrence or persistent symptoms after one or more previous procedures for excision of an interdigital neuroma. Ten patients underwent concomitant excision of a primary neuroma from an adjacent interspace, and 19 underwent concomitant forefoot surgery. The mean follow-up was 39.7 months (6 to 79). Evaluation included review of records and radiographs, clinical assessment, and a questionnaire regarding satisfaction, pain, restriction of footwear and activity. In total, 15 patients (30.7%) were completely satisfied, 13 (26.5%) were satisfied with minor reservations, ten (20.4%) were satisfied with major reservations and 11 (22.4%) were dissatisfied with the outcome. Of the 49 patients, 28 (57.2%) had no or mild pain, 29 (59.2%) had moderate or severe restriction of footwear and eight (16.3%) had moderate restriction of activity.

Intra-operative findings, simultaneous surgery to adjacent interspaces, concomitant forefoot surgery and previous re-explorations did not significantly influence the outcome. Persistent or recurrent symptoms after transection of a nerve present a challenging problem for both the surgeon and patient. It is essential that there is a thorough pre-operative discussion with the patient, providing the rates of failure and the increased likelihood of restriction of footwear and activity after revision surgery.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General