Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 2, 205-211.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14324  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolish
Right arrow Japanese
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Oakes, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Oakes, B.

Reoperation after autologous chondrocyte implantation

INDICATIONS AND FINDINGS

I. Henderson, FRACS, Director

Orthopaedic Research Department

B. Tuy, MD, Clinical Fellow

AOA Fellowship in Knee, Shoulder, Foot and Ankle Surgery, St Vincent’s and Mercy Private Hospital, 166 Gipps Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.

B. Oakes, MD, Associate Professor

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr I. Henderson.

We have reviewed 22 patients from a total of 135 treated by autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) who had undergone further surgery for pain in the knee and mechanical symptoms after a mean of 10.5 months. There were 31 grafted lesions. At operation the findings included lifting (24/31) and detachment (3/31) of periosteal patches for which arthroscopic shaving was performed. Chondroplasty was undertaken on two new lesions, another required an ACI and a further patient required trimming of a meniscus.

The mechanical symptoms resolved within two weeks. At the last review, two to 14 months from reoperation; 68% had improved, and 86% had normal or nearly normal IKDC scores. Of the 31 lesions, 30 (97%) had normal or nearly normal visual repair scores.

Biopsy showed good integration with subchondral bone and the marginal interface in all specimens, most of which showed hyaline or hyaline-like cartilage (70%). Troublesome mechanical symptoms required surgery in 13% of ACI-treated patients and were attributed to periosteal extrusion. Simple arthroscopic debridement was curative.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
W. Bartlett, J. A. Skinner, C. R. Gooding, R. W. J. Carrington, A. M. Flanagan, T. W. R. Briggs, and G. Bentley
Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2005; 87-B(5): 640 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General