Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 2, 239-243.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.13624  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolish
Right arrow KoreanJapanese
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, A.

Do CT scans aid assessment of distal tibial physeal fractures?

L. Cutler, FRCS ED (Trauma and Orth)

SpR Mersey Rotation, c/o A. Bass, Alder Hey Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK.

A. Molloy, FRCS

SpR Mersey Rotation, Leighton Hospital, Middlewich Road, Crewe, Cheshire CW1 4QJ, UK.

V. Dhukuram, FRCS, SHO in Orthopaedics

Wishaw General Hospital, 90 Netherton Street, Wishaw ML2 0DP, UK.

A. Bass, FRCS (Trauma Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Alder Hey Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Miss L. Cutler at 1 Fairfield Gardens, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 2BX, UK.

Distal tibial physeal fractures are the second most common growth plate injury and the most common cause of growth arrest and deformity. This study assesses the accuracy of pre-operative planning for placement of the screws in these fractures using either standard radiographs or CT scans.

We studied 62 consecutive physeal fractures over a period of four years. An outline of a single cut of the CT scan was used for each patient. An ideal position for the screw was determined as being perpendicular to and at the midpoint of the fracture. The difference in entry point and direction of the screw between the ideal and the observers’ assessments were compared using the paired Student’s t-test. There was a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in the accuracy of the point of insertion and the direction of the screw on the pre-operative plan when CT scans were used rather than plain radiographs.

We would, therefore, recommend that CT scans are routinely used in the pre-operative assessment and treatment of distal tibial physeal fractures.




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Letter from Mr A J Bing
Andrew J Bing, et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 6 Jan 2005 [Full text]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General