Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 3, 337-343.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14287  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolishRussian
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stockley, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stockley, I.

The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty

N. M. Graham, FRCS, FRCS Orth, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire SY10 7AG, UK.

I. Stockley, MD, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr N. M. Graham.

Between April 1992 and November 1998 we used 34 massive proximal femoral allografts for femoral reconstruction at revision hip arthroplasty. Seven patients have died and two have been lost to follow-up. There were thus 25 grafts in 24 patients for review. The mean follow-up was 53 months (16 to 101). By the time of the review two patients had undergone a further revision for failure of the allograft. Another had required secondary plating and grafting at the graft-host junction for symptomatic nonunion. One had recurrence of deep sepsis and was being managed conservatively.

Trochanteric union was considered to have occurred radiologically in 16 of the 25 grafts and union at the host-graft junction in 20. Resorption of the allograft was significant in only two hips. We recommend this technique in cases in which femoral bone loss has been catastrophic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
K. A. Michalak, P. P. C. Khoo, P. J. Yates, R. E. Day, and D. J. Wood
Iontophoresed segmental allografts in revision arthroplasty for infection
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2006; 88-B(11): 1430 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. P. C. Khoo, K. A. Michalak, P. J. Yates, S. M. Megson, R. E. Day, and D. J. Wood
Iontophoresis of antibiotics into segmental allografts
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2006; 88-B(9): 1149 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General