Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 3, 406-412.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14350  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolishRussian
Right arrow Korean
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B.

Complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand

RESULTS OF A MODIFIED PINS AND RUBBERS TRACTION SYSTEM

S. C. Deshmukh, MS, MCH Orth, FRCS, FRCS Orth, Consultant in Hand Upper Limb Surgery; D. Kumar, MS, MSc (Trauma), FRCS, Registrar; K. Mathur, FRCS Orth, Registrar; and B. Thomas, MSc Orth, Registrar

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr S. C. Deshmukh.

We reviewed 13 patients with a complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger and one patient with a complex fracture-dislocation of the interphalangeal joint of thumb. We had treated these injuries using a pins and rubbers traction system which had been modified to avoid friction of the pins against the bone during mobilisation of the joint in order to minimise the risk of osteolysis. A Michigan hand outcome questionnaire was used for subjective assessment. The active range of movement (AROM) of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints and the grip strength were used for objective assessment.

The mean follow-up was 34 months (12 to 49). The mean normalised Michigan hand outcome score was 84. The mean AROM of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 85° and that of the distal interphalangeal joint 48°. The mean grip strength was 92% of the uninvolved hand.

Twelve patients have returned to their original occupations. There has been no radiological osteolysis or clinical osteomyelitis. This modified traction system has given acceptable results with a low rate of complications. It is light, cheap, effective and easy to apply.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General