Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue 8, 1146-1151.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B8.14839  
Copyright © 2004 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzech
Right arrow KoreanJapanese
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koivikko, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koivikko, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L.

Factors associated with nonunion in conservatively-treated type-II fractures of the odontoid process

M. P. Koivikko, MD, Radiologist; M. J. Kiuru, MS, PhD, MSc, Resident in Radiology; and S. K. Koskinen, MD, PhD, Radiologist-in-Chief

Department of Radiology

P. Myllynen, MD, PhD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; and S. Santavirta, MD, PhD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Helsinki University Central Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, PO Box 266, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland.

L. Kivisaari, MD, PhD, Professor of Radiology

Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PO Box 340, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. P. Koivikko.

In type-II fractures of the odontoid process, the treatment is either conservative in a halo vest or primary surgical stabilisation. Since nonunion, requiring prolonged immobilisation or late surgery, is common in patients treated in a halo vest, the identification of those in whom this treatment is likely to fail is important.

We reviewed the data of 69 patients with acute type-II fractures of the odontoid process treated in a halo vest. The mean follow-up was 12 months. Conservative treatment was successful, resulting in bony union in 32 (46%) patients. Anterior dislocation, gender and age were unrelated to nonunion. However, nonunion did correlate with a fracture gap (>1 mm), posterior displacement (> 5 mm), delayed start of treatment (> 4 days) and posterior redisplacement (> 2 mm).

We conclude that patients presenting with these risk factors are unlikely to achieve bony union by treatment in a halo vest. They deserve careful attention during the follow-up period and should also be considered as candidates for primary surgical stabilisation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
D. S. KORRES, G. D. CHLORES, and G. S. THEMISTOCLEOUS
Factors associated with nonunion in conservatively-treated type-II fractures of the odontoid process
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 137 - 137.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Letter from Korres, Chloros and Themistocleous
Dimitrios S. Korres, et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 8 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Response to the letter by Korres, Chloros and Themistocleous from the authors
Mika P Koivikko
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General