Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 11, 1524-1526.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16354  
Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishGermanItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzech
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwong, F. N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Power, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kwong, F. N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Power, R. A.

Incidence of infection with the use of non-irradiated morcellised allograft bone washed at the time of revision arthroplasty of the hip

F. N. K. Kwong, MRCSEd, Clinical Research Fellow1; T. Ibrahim, MRCS(Ed & Eng), Specialist Registrar1; and R. A. Power, FRCSEd(Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr F. N. K. Kwong; e-mail: fcng{at}yahoo.com

Implantation of allograft bone is an integral part of revision surgery of the hip. One major concern with its use is the risk of transmission of infective agents. There are a number of methods of processing allograft bone in order to reduce this risk. One method requires washing the tissue using pulsed irrigation immediately before implantation. We report the incidence of deep bacterial infection in 138 patients (144 revision hip arthroplasties) who had undergone implantation of allograft bone. The bone used was fresh-frozen, non-irradiated and pulse-washed with normal saline before implantation. The deep infection rate at a minimum follow-up of one year was 0.7%. This method of processing appears to be associated with a very low risk of allograft-related bacterial infection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. W. Emms, S. C. Buckley, I. Stockley, A. J. Hamer, and R. M. Kerry
Mid- to long-term results of irradiated allograft in acetabular reconstruction: A FOLLOW-UP REPORT
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2009; 91-B(11): 1419 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
G. J. van de Pol, P. D. J. Sturm, C. J. van Loon, C. Verhagen, and B. W. Schreurs
Microbiological cultures of allografts of the femoral head just before transplantation
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2007; 89-B(9): 1225 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General