|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 2,
171-174.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15640 Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Is there a role for extended antibiotic therapy in a two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty?D. A. Hoad-Reddick, MBChB, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Cavendish Hip Fellow1; C. R. Evans, MBChB, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon2; P. Norman, MA, MSc, MB, FRCPath, Consultant Microbiologist3; and I. Stockley, MD, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Correspondence should be sent to Mr I. Stockley; e-mail: ian.stockley{at}sth.nhs.uk
All major studies have incorporated the use of prolonged courses of parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy in the management of two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty. We present a series of 59 consecutive patients, all with microbiologically-proven deep infection of a total knee arthroplasty, in whom a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy was not routinely used. The mean follow-up was 56.4 months (24 to 114). Of the 38 patients who underwent a staged exchange, infection was successfully eradicated in 34 (89%) but recurrent or persistent infection was present in four (11%). Our rate of cure for infection is similar to that reported elsewhere. We conclude that a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy seems not to alter the incidence of recurrent or persistent infection. The costs of the administration of antibiotics are high and such a regime may be unnecessary. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



