This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hendriks, J. G. E. Articles by Busscher, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hendriks, J. G. E. Articles by Busscher, H. J.

Bacterial survival in the interfacial gap in gentamicin-loaded acrylic bone cements

¹ Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr H. J. Busscher; e-mail: h.j.busscher{at}med.rug.nl

Clinical experience indicates the beneficial effects of antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Although in vitro studies have shown the formation of a biofilm on its surface they have not considered the gap between the cement and the bone. We have investigated bacterial survival in that gap. Samples with gaps 200 µm wide were made of different bone cements. These were stored dry (‘pre-elution’) or submersed in phosphate-buffered saline to simulate the initial release of gentamicin (‘post-elution’). The gaps were subsequently inoculated with bacteria, which had been isolated from infected orthopaedic prostheses and assessed for their sensitivity to gentamicin. Bacterial survival was measured 24 hours after inoculation. All the strains survived in plain cements. In the pre-elution gentamicin-loaded cements only the most gentamicin-resistant strain, CN5115, survived, but in post-elution samples more strains did so, depending on the cement tested. Although high concentrations of gentamicin were demonstrated in the gaps only the gentamicin-sensitive strains were killed. This could explain the increased prevalence of gentamicin-resistant infections which are seen clinically.