Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 6, 837-840.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15608  
Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azzopardi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Abela, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azzopardi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Abela, M.

Unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED STUDY OF IMMOBILISATION IN A CAST VERSUS SUPPLEMENTARY PERCUTANEOUS PINNING

T. Azzopardi, FRCSEd(Tr & Orth), Orthopaedic Registrar; S. Ehrendorfer, MD, Orthopaedic Consultant Surgeon; T. Coulton, MCSP, Orthopaedic Specialist Physiotherapist; and M. Abela, MD, MSc, FRCS(G)(Tr & Orth), Orthopaedic Surgeon

Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Dalnair Street, Glasgow G3 8SJ, UK, Wishaw General Hospital, Netherton Street, Wishaw, ML2 0DP, UK, St Luke’s Hospital, Guardamangia Hill, Guardamangia, MSD09, Malta.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr T. Azzopardi; e-mail: thomasazzopardi{at}hotmail.com

We performed a prospective, randomised study on 57 patients older than 60 years of age with unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of immobilisation in a cast alone with that using supplementary, percutaneous pinning.

Patients treated by percutaneous wires had a statistically significant improvement in dorsal angulation (mean 7°), radial length (mean 3 mm) and radial inclination (mean 3 mm) at one year. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome in terms of pain, range of movement, grip strength, activities of daily living and the SF-36 score except for an improved range of movement in ulnar deviation in the percutaneous wire group. One patient developed a pin-track infection which required removal of the wires at two weeks.

We conclude that percutaneous pinning of unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius provides only a marginal improvement in the radiological parameters compared with immobilisation in a cast alone. This does not correlate with an improved functional outcome in a low-demand, elderly population.




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Distal radial fractures
Kalpesh Shah
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 23 Jun 2005 [Full text]

(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General