Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 7, 937-939.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16005  
Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishGermanItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzech
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, B. N.

A comparison of knee braces during walking for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee

J. D. Richards, PhD, Professor of Biomechanics Allied Health Professions Unit1; J. Sanchez-Ballester, FRCS (Tr&Orth), Specialist Registrar in Orthopaedics2; R. K. Jones, BSc, Lecturer in Biomechanics3; N. Darke, BSc, Prosthetist/Orthotist3; and B. N. Livingstone, FRCS, Consultant in Orthopaedics2

1 Faculty of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
2 Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan, Lancashire WN1 2NN, UK.
3 Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor J. D. Richards; e-mail: JRichards{at}UCLan.ac.uk

In this cross-over study, we evaluated two types of knee brace commonly used in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Twelve patients confirmed radiologically as having unilateral osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (Larsen grade 2 to grade 4) were studied. Treatment with a simple hinged brace was compared with that using a valgus corrective brace. Knee kinematics, ground reaction forces, pain and function were assessed during walking and the Hospital for Special Surgery scores were also determined.

Significant improvements in pain, function, and loading and propulsive forces were seen with the valgus brace. Treatment with a simple brace showed only significant improvements in loading forces. Our findings suggest that although both braces improved confidence and function during gait, the valgus brace showed greater benefit.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General