|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 7,
997-999.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16061 Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery A study of telephone screening and direct observation of surgical wound infections after discharge from hospitalJ. Reilly, PhD, BA(Hons), RGN, Consultant Nurse Epidemiologist1; A. Noone, MSc, FFPHM, Consultant Medical Epidemiologist1; A. Clift, RGN, Audit Nurse2; L. Cochrane, BSc, PhD, Lecturer2; L. Johnston, RGN, BN, Audit Manager2; D. I. Rowley, BMedBiol, MD, FRCS, Professor2; G. Phillips, MB BS, FRCPath, Dip HIC, Consultant Medical Microbiology3; and F. Sullivan, PhD, FRCP, FRCGP, Professor4
1 Health Protection Scotland, Clifton House, Clifton Place, Glasgow G3 7BR, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Professor D. I. Rowley; e-mail: d.i.rowley{at}dundee.ac.uk
Post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection is necessary if accurate rates of infection following surgery are to be available. We undertook a prospective study of 376 knee and hip replacements in 366 patients in order to estimate the rate of orthopaedic surgical site infection in the community. The inpatient infection was 3.1% and the post-discharge infection rate was 2.1%. We concluded that the use of telephone interviews of patients to identify the group at highest risk of having a surgical site infection (those who think they have an infection) with rapid follow-up by a professional trained to diagnose infection according to agreed criteria is an effective method of identifying infection after discharge from hospital.
|
|


