Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue 8, 1107-1110.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.15610  
Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishGermanItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzech
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, D.

Revision surgery for nonunion after early failure of fixation of fractures of the distal humerus

A. Ali, MRCS, Specialist Registrar in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery1; H. Douglas, Medical Student1; and D. Stanley, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 The Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr D. Stanley; e-mail: claire.faulkner{at}sth.nhs.uk

Sixteen patients who underwent a revision operation for nonunion of fractures of the distal humerus following previous internal fixation were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 39 months (8 to 69).

The Mayo elbow performance score was excellent in 11, good in two, fair in two and poor in one. In 15 patients union was achieved and in one with an infected nonunion a subsequent bone graft was necessary in order to obtain union.

Age, gender, a history of smoking, mechanism of the injury and the AO classification of the initial fracture did not correlate with the development of nonunion. In 12 patients (75%), the initial fixation was assessed as being suboptimal. The primary surgery was regarded as adequate in only three patients. Our findings suggest that the most important determinant of nonunion of a distal humeral fracture after surgery is the adequacy of fixation.




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

The role of biological augmentation in nonunion
Anil Agarwal, et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 17 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Letter from Mr Joshy
Suraj Joshy, et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 18 Aug 2005 [Full text]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General