This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Further opinion Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Falliner, A. Articles by Hassenpflug, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Falliner, A. Articles by Hassenpflug, J.

Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen

¹ Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery
² Institut for Medical Informatics and Statistics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. Falliner at Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Kiel, Michaelisstrasse 1, D-24105 Kiel, Germany; e-mail: falli{at}orthop.uni-kiel.de

In a prospective study, 232 neonates were examined sonographically using the methods of Graf and Terjesen. In order to determine the reproducibility of the methods, 50 hips were evaluated by two skilled examiners. In an inter-observer study, five physicians and five medical students evaluated 24 images, which were evaluated on ten occasions at two-weekly intervals by one of the authors. Statistical evaluation used the Bland-Altman approach.

The neonates (110 females, 122 males) were less than four days old. The mean angle was 62.4° and mean femoral head cover was 55.4%. According to Graf’s method, 1.3% of hips were pathological, compared with 4.1% according to Terjesen. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between femoral head cover and angles was 0.552. The Bland-Altman approach shows greater variation for femoral head cover than for , if measured by experienced examiners. The Bland-Altman approach shows almost equal reproducibility for and femoral head cover in the inter-observer test, but better repeatability for in the intra-observer test.

The Graf results relate better than Terjesen’s to the well-known frequency of 1% to 2% hip dysplasia in the European population. Kappa statistics indicate a fair agreement between the two methods. Inter-observer evaluation shows an equal reproducibility of both methods, whereas intra-observer tests reveal better repeatability with Graf’s method.