|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 88-B, Issue 3,
341-344.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.17017 Copyright © 2006 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Comparison of two types of ulnar component in type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritisA LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UPN. Tanaka, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Vice-President1; H. Sakahashi, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; S. Ishii, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Professor Emeritus2; and H. Kudo, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Honorary President3
1 Sapporo Gorinbashi, Orthopedic Hospital in Gorinbashi Health Care, Facilities and Hospitals, 2-1, Kawazoe, Minami-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 005-0802, Japan. Correspondence should be sent to Dr N. Tanaka; e-mail: nobuyuki.tanaka{at}ryumachi-jp.com
The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term results (more than ten years) of two types of cemented ulnar component with type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in a consecutive series of 56 patients (60 elbows) with rheumatoid arthritis, and to compare the results in elbows above and below a Larsen grade IV. There was no radiolucency around the humeral component. Patients in whom a metal-backed ulnar component and a porous-coated stem were used had better clinical results and significantly less progression of radiolucent line formation around the ulnar component. They also had a significantly better long-term survival than patients with an all-polyethylene ulnar component. The clinical results of arthroplasty using all-polyethylene ulnar components were inferior, regardless of the degree of joint destruction. We conclude that the type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty with cementless fixation of the porous-coated humeral component and cemented fixation of a metal-backed ulnar component is acceptable and well-tolerated by rheumatoid patients. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||



