|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 88-B, Issue 3,
362-365.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.16425 Copyright © 2006 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Supracondylar humeral fractures in childrenTEN YEARS EXPERIENCE IN A TEACHING HOSPITALJ. Mangwani, MS(Orth), MRCS, Specialist Registrar1; R. Nadarajah, MRCS, Specialist Registrar2; and J. M. H. Paterson, FRCS, Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon3
1 Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester CO4 5JL, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Mr J. Mangwani at 24 Pastoral Way, Warley, Brentwood, Essex CM14 5WF, UK; e-mail: jmangwani{at}hotmail.com
Although supracondylar fracture is a very common elbow injury in childhood, there is no consensus on the timing of surgery, approach for open reduction and positioning of fixation wires. We report our ten-year experience between 1993 and 2003 in 291 children. Most fractures (285; 98%) were extension injuries, mainly Gartland types II (73; 25%) and III (163; 56%). Six (2%) were open fractures and a neurovascular deficit was seen in 12 (4%) patients. Of the 236 children (81%) who required an operation, 181 (77%) were taken to theatre on the day of admission. Most (177; 75%) of the operations were performed by specialist registrars. Fixation was by crossed Kirschner wires in 158 of 186 (85%) patients and open reduction was necessary in 52 (22%). A post-operative neurological deficit was seen in nine patients (4%) and three (1%) required exploration of the ulnar nerve. Only 22 (4%) patients had a long-term deformity, nine (3%) from malreduction and three (1%) because of growth arrest, but corrective surgery for functional limitation was required in only three (1%) patients. This article has been cited by other articles:
eLetters:Read all eLetters
|
|
||||||||||||



