|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 88-B, Issue 4,
472-476.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17333 Copyright © 2006 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Differences in ion release after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip replacementMEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UPL. Savarino, MSc, Senior Investigator1; M. Greco, Technician1; E. Cenni, MD, Senior Investigator1; L. Cavasinni, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon2; R. Rotini, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon3; N. Baldini, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon4; and A. Giunti, MD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery4
1 Laboratory for Pathophysiology of Orthopaedic Implants Correspondence should be sent to Dr L. Savarino; e-mail: lucia.savarino{at}ior.it
Modern metal-on-metal bearings produce less wear debris and osteolysis, but have the potential adverse effect of release of ions. Improved ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have the lowest wear of all, but the corrosion process has not been analysed. Our aim was to measure the serum ion release (ng/ml) in 23 patients having stable hip prostheses with a ceramic-on-ceramic coupling (group A) and to compare it with the release in 42 patients with a metal-on-metal bearing (group B) in the medium term. Reference values were obtained from a population of 47 healthy subjects (group C). The concentrations of chromium, cobalt, aluminium and titanium were measured. There was a significant increase of cobalt, chromium and aluminium levels (p < 0.05) in group B compared with groups A and C. Group A did not differ significantly from the control group. Despite the apparent advantage of a metal-on-metal coupling, especially in younger patients with a long life expectancy, a major concern arises regarding the extent and duration of ion exposure. For this reason, the low corrosion level in a ceramic-on-ceramic coupling could be advantageous. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||



