This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rogers, B. A. Articles by Briggs, T. W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rogers, B. A. Articles by Briggs, T. W. R.

Interobserver variation in the measurement of patellar height after total knee arthroplasty

¹ Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey.
² John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DZ, UK.
³ Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr B. A. Rogers at 38 Woodham Waye, Woking, Surrey GU21 5SJ, UK; e-mail: benedictrogers{at}hotmail.com

We assessed the reproducibility and accuracy of four ratios used to measure patellar height, namely the Blackburne-Peel, Caton-Deschamps, Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati, before and after total knee arthroplasty. The patellar height was measured, by means of the four ratios, on the pre- and post-operative lateral radiographs of 44 patients (45 knees) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. Two independent observers measured the films sequentially, in identical conditions, totalling 720 measurements per observer. Statistical analysis, comparing both observers and ratios, was carried out using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Before operation there was greater interobserver variation using either the Insall-Salvati or modified Insall-Salvati ratios than when using the Caton-Deschamps or Blackburne-Peel methods. This was because of difficulty in identifying the insertion of the patellar tendon. Before operation, there was a minimal difference in reliability between these methods. After operation the interobserver difference was greatly reduced using both the Caton-Deschamps and Blackburne-Peel methods, which use the prosthetic joint line, compared with the Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati, which reference from the insertion of the patellar tendon.

The theoretical advantage of using the Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati ratios in measuring true patellar height after total knee arthroplasty needs to be balanced against their significant interobserver variability and inferior reliability when compared with other ratios.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Luyckx, K. Didden, H. Vandenneucker, L. Labey, B. Innocenti, and J. Bellemans Is there a biomechanical explanation for anterior knee pain in patients with patella alta?: INFLUENCE OF PATELLAR HEIGHT ON PATELLOFEMORAL CONTACT FORCE, CONTACT AREA AND CONTACT PRESSURE J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2009; 91-B(3): 344 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Hanusch, L. Goodchild, P. Finn, and A. Rangan Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND INTEGRITY OF THE REPAIR AFTER A MINI-OPEN PROCEDURE J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2009; 91-B(2): 201 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]