This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pandit, H. Articles by Murray, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pandit, H. Articles by Murray, D. W.

Combined anterior cruciate reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

¹ Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
² Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
³ North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Surrey, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr H. Pandit; e-mail: HGargi{at}aol.com

The options for treatment of the young active patient with isolated symptomatic osteoarthritis of the medial compartment and pre-existing deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament are limited. The potential longevity of the implant and levels of activity of the patient may preclude total knee replacement, and tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are unreliable because of the ligamentous instability. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties tend to fail because of wear or tibial loosening resulting from eccentric loading. Therefore, we combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee in 15 patients (ACLR group), and matched them with 15 patients who had undergone Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACLI group). The clinical and radiological data at a minimum of 2.5 years were compared for both groups.

The groups were well matched for age, gender and length of follow-up and had no significant differences in their pre-operative scores. At the last follow-up, the mean outcome scores for both the ACLR and ACLI groups were high (Oxford knee scores of 46 (37 to 48) and 43 (38 to 46), respectively, objective Knee Society scores of 99 (95 to 100) and 94 (82 to 100), and functional Knee Society scores of 96 and 96 (both 85 to 100). One patient in the ACLR group needed revision to a total knee replacement because of infection. No patient in either group had radiological evidence of component loosening. The radiological study showed no difference in the pattern of tibial loading between the groups.

The short-term clinical results of combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are excellent. The previous shortcomings of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the presence of deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament appear to have been addressed with the combined procedure. This operation seems to be a viable treatment option for young active patients with symptomatic arthritis of the medial compartment, in whom the anterior cruciate ligament has been ruptured.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Murray, R. Fitzpatrick, K. Rogers, H. Pandit, D. J. Beard, A. J. Carr, and J. Dawson The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2007; 89-B(8): 1010 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]