This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, J. E. Articles by Grimer, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Phillips, J. E. Articles by Grimer, R. J.

The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital

A 15-YEAR PROSPECTIVE SURVEY

¹ Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
² Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr R. J. Grimer; e-mail: rob.grimer{at}roh.nhs.uk

The Control of Infection Committee at a specialist orthopaedic hospital prospectively collected data on all episodes of bacteriologically-proven deep infection arising after primary hip and knee replacements over a 15-year period from 1987 to 2001.

There were 10 735 patients who underwent primary hip or knee replacement. In 34 of 5947 hip replacements (0.57%) and 41 of 4788 knee replacements (0.86%) a deep infection developed. The most common infecting micro-organism was coagulase-negative staphylococcus, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and streptococci. Of the infecting organisms, 72% were sensitive to routine prophylactic antimicrobial agents.

Of the infections, 29% (22) arose in the first three months following surgery, 35% between three months and one year (26), and 36% (27) after one year. Most cases were detected early and treated aggressively, with eradication of the infection in 96% (72). There was no significant change in the infection rate or type of infecting micro-organism over the course of this study.

These results set a benchmark, and importantly emphasise that only 64% of peri-prosthetic infections arise within one year of surgery. These results also illustrate the advantages of conducting joint replacement surgery in the isolation of a specialist hospital.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Whittaker, R. E. Warren, R. S. Jones, and P. A. Gregson Is prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment essential in two-stage revision hip replacement for chronic Gram-positive infection? J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2009; 91-B(1): 44 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Anwar, C. H. Aldam, S. Visuvanathan, and A. J. Hart The effect of metal ions in solution on bacterial growth compared with wear particles from hip replacements J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2007; 89-B(12): 1655 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. I. Roberts, C. N. A. Esler, and W. M. Harper A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2007; 89-B(11): 1452 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Chitre, M. J. Fehily, and D. J. Bamford Total hip replacement after intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic and steroid J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2007; 89-B(2): 166 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. CHITRE and S. SADIQ The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective study J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2007; 89-B(2): 281 - 281. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: