Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 1, 45-49.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.17728  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikeuchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ikeuchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, T.

Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement

A COMPARISON OF TWO TECHNIQUES

M. Ikeuchi, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; N. Yamanaka, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; Y. Okanoue, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; E. Ueta, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; and T. Tani, MD, PhD, Professor and Chairman1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku 783-8505, Japan.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. Ikeuchi; e-mail: ikeuchim{at}med.kochi-u.ac.jp

We prospectively assessed the benefits of using either a range-of-movement technique or an anatomical landmark method to determine the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement. We analysed the cut proximal tibia intraoperatively, determining anteroposterior axes by the range-of-movement technique and comparing them with the anatomical anteroposterior axis.

We found that the range-of-movement technique tended to leave the tibial component more internally rotated than when anatomical landmarks were used. In addition, it gave widely variable results (mean 7.5°; 2° to 17°), determined to some extent by which posterior reference point was used. Because of the wide variability and the possibilities for error, we consider that it is inappropriate to use the range-of-movement technique as the sole method of determining alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General