|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 1,
45-49.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.17728 Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacementA COMPARISON OF TWO TECHNIQUESM. Ikeuchi, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; N. Yamanaka, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; Y. Okanoue, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; E. Ueta, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; and T. Tani, MD, PhD, Professor and Chairman11 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku 783-8505, Japan. Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. Ikeuchi; e-mail: ikeuchim{at}med.kochi-u.ac.jp
We prospectively assessed the benefits of using either a range-of-movement technique or an anatomical landmark method to determine the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement. We analysed the cut proximal tibia intraoperatively, determining anteroposterior axes by the range-of-movement technique and comparing them with the anatomical anteroposterior axis. We found that the range-of-movement technique tended to leave the tibial component more internally rotated than when anatomical landmarks were used. In addition, it gave widely variable results (mean 7.5°; 2° to 17°), determined to some extent by which posterior reference point was used. Because of the wide variability and the possibilities for error, we consider that it is inappropriate to use the range-of-movement technique as the sole method of determining alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement.
|
|


