Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 1, 62-65.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18264  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ito, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.

The outcome of peri-operative humeral condylar fractures after total elbow replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

H. Ito, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor1; T. Matsumoto, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; H. Yoshitomi, MD, PhD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; R. Kakinoki, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor1; and T. Nakamura, MD, PhD, Professor and Chairman1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr H. Ito; e-mail: hiromu{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

We compared the outcome of peri-operative humeral condylar fractures in patients undergoing a Coonrad-Morrey semiconstrained total elbow replacement with that of patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing the same procedure without fractures. In a consecutive series of 40 elbows in 33 patients, 13 elbows had a fracture in either condyle peri-operatively, and 27 elbows were intact. The fractured condyle was either fixed internally or excised. We found no statistical difference in the patients’ background, such as age, length of follow-up, immobilisation period, Larsen’s radiological grade, or Steinbrocker’s stage and functional class. There was also no statistical difference between the groups in relation to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, muscle strength, range of movement, or radiolucency around the implants at a mean of 4.8 years (1.1 to 8.0) follow-up.

We conclude that fractured condyles can be successfully treated with either internal fixation or excision, and cause no harmful effect.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General