Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 10, 1283-1288.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.19435  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tayton, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tayton, E.

Femoral anteversion

A NECESSARY ANGLE OR AN EVOLUTIONARY VESTIGE?

E. Tayton, MBBS, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow1

1 Orthopaedics Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr E. Tayton; e-mail: edwardtayton{at}hotmail.com

In an adult man the mean femoral anteversion angle measures approximately 15°, for which the reasons have never been fully elucidated.

An assortment of simian and quadruped mammalian femora was therefore examined and the anteversion angles measured. A simple static mathematical model was then produced to explain the forces acting on the neck of the femur in the quadruped and in man. Femoral anteversion was present in all the simian and quadruped femora and ranged between 4° and 41°. It thus appears that man has retained this feature despite evolving from quadrupedal locomotion.

Quadrupeds generally mobilise with their hips flexed forwards from the vertical; in this position, it is clear that anteversion gives biomechanical advantage against predominantly vertical forces. In man with mobilisation on vertical femora, the biomechanical advantage of anteversion is against forces acting mainly in the horizontal plane. This has implications in regard to the orientation of hip replacements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Robin, H. K. Graham, P. Selber, F. Dobson, K. Smith, and R. Baker
Proximal femoral geometry in cerebral palsy: A POPULATION-BASED CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2008; 90-B(10): 1372 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General