This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tayton, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tayton, K.

Does the upper femoral epiphysis slip or rotate?

¹ Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport, South Wales, NP20 2UB, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr K. Tayton; e-mail: Keithtayton{at}hotmail.com

Although much has been published on the causes of slipped upper femoral epiphysis and the results of treatment, little attention has been given to the mechanism of the slip. This study presents the results of the analysis of 13 adolescent femora, and the attempts to reproduce the radiological appearances of a typical slip. The mean age of the skeletons was 13 years (11 to 15). It was found that the internal bony architecture in the zone of the growth plate was such that a slip of the epiphysis on the metaphysis (in the normal meaning of the word slip) could not take place, largely relating to the presence of a tubercle of bone projecting down from the epiphysis. The only way that the appearance of a typical slipped upper femoral epiphysis could be reproduced was by rotating the epiphysis posteromedially on the metaphysis. The presence and size of this peg-like tubercle was shown radiologically by CT scanning in one pair of intact adolescent femurs.