Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 11, 1431-1438.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19336  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hing, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shimmin, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hing, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shimmin, A. J.

The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years

AN INDEPENDENT PROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF THE FIRST 230 HIPS

C. B. Hing, MD, FRCS(Orth), Orthopaedic Fellow1; D. L. Back, BSc, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon2; M. Bailey, BSc, MSc, PhD, Statistical Consultant3; D. A. Young, MBBS, FA(OrthA), Orthopaedic Surgeon1; R. E. Dalziel, MBBS, FA(OrthoA), Orthopaedic Surgeon1; and A. J. Shimmin, MBBS, FA(OrthoA), Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, 33 The Avenue, Windsor, Victoria 3181, Australia.
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Guys & St Thomas Hospital, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, UK.
3 Department of Epidemiology & Preventative Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. J. Shimmin; e-mail: ashimmin{at}optusnet.com.au

We report an independent prospective review of the first 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 212 patients at a mean follow-up of five years (4 to 6).

Two patients, one with a loose acetabular component and the other with suspected avascular necrosis of the femoral head, underwent revision. There were two deaths from unrelated causes and one patient was lost to follow-up. The survivorship with the worst-case scenario was 97.8% (95% confidence interval 95.8 to 99.5). The mean Harris hip score improved significantly (paired t-test, p < 0.05) from 62.54 (8 to 92) pre-operatively to 97.7 (61 to 100) at a mean of three years (2.1 to 4.3), then deteriorated slightly to a mean of 95.2 (47 to 100) at a mean of five years. The mean flexion improved from 91.5° (25° to 140°) to 110.4° (80° to 145°) at a mean of three years with no further improvement at five years (111.2°; 70° to 160°).

On radiological review at five years, one patient had a progressive lucent line around the acetabular component and six had progressive lucent lines around the femoral component. A total of 18 femoral components (8%) had migrated into varus and those with lucent lines present migrated a mean of 3.8° (1.02° to 6.54°) more than the rest. Superolateral notching of the femoral neck and reactive sclerosis at the tip of the peg of the femoral component were associated with the presence of lucent lines (chi-squared test, p < 0.05), but not with migration of the femoral component, and are of unknown significance.

Our results with the Birmingham hip resurfacing continue to be satisfactory at a mean follow-up of five years.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
B. Ollivere, C. Darrah, T. Barker, J. Nolan, and M. J. Porteous
Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2009; 91-B(8): 1025 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Olsen, E. T. Davis, J. P. Waddell, and E. H. Schemitsch
Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2009; 91-B(3): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. T. Steffen, H. P. Pandit, J. Palan, D. J. Beard, R. Gundle, P. McLardy-Smith, D. W. Murray, and H. S. Gill
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: AN INDEPENDENT SERIES
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2008; 90-B(4): 436 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Moonot, P. J. Singh, M. D. Cronin, Y. E. Kalairajah, T. G. Kavanagh, and R. E. Field
Birmingham hip resurfacing: IS ACETABULAR BONE CONSERVED?
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2008; 90-B(3): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General