Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 4, 477-480.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18094  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, R. J.

Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement

NO DIFFERENCE IN FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AT TWO YEARS

J. M. Spencer, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Arthroplasty Fellow1; S. K. Chauhan, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon2; K. Sloan, MSc, Project Coordinator3; A. Taylor, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Orthopaedic Surgeon4; and R. J. Beaver, FRACS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Head of Department1

1 Department of Elective Orthopaedics
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.
3 Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic, Royal Perth Hospital, 6 Selby Street, Shenton Park, 6008, Perth, Western Australia.
4 Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr R. J. Beaver; e-mail: rjbeav{at}bigpond.com

We previously compared the component alignment in total knee replacement using a computer-navigated technique with a conventional jig-based method. We randomly allocated 71 patients to undergo either computer-navigated or conventional replacement. An improved alignment was seen in the computer-navigated group.

The patients were then followed up post-operatively for two years, using the Knee Society score, the Short Form-36 health survey, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, the Bartlett Patellar pain questionnaire and the Oxford knee score, to assess functional outcome.

At two years post-operatively 60 patients were available for assessment, 30 in each group and 62 patients completed a postal survey. No patient in either group had undergone revision. All variables were analysed for differences between the groups either by Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences between the two groups did not reach significance for any of the outcome measures at any time point. At two years postoperatively, the frequency of mild to severe anterior pain was not significantly different (p = 0.818), varying between 44% (14) for the computer-navigated group, and 47% (14) for the conventionally-replaced group. The Bartlett Patellar score and the Oxford knee score were also not significantly different (t-test p = 0.161 and p = 0.607, respectively).

The clinical outcome of the patients with a computer-navigated knee replacement appears to be no different to that of a more conventional jig-based technique at two years post-operatively, despite the better alignment achieved with computer-navigated surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. M. Sikorski
Alignment in total knee replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1121 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
H. Mizu-uchi, S. Matsuda, H. Miura, K. Okazaki, Y. Akasaki, and Y. Iwamoto
The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2008; 90-B(8): 1025 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Lutzner, F. Krummenauer, C. Wolf, K.-P. Gunther, and S. Kirschner
Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A COMPARATIVE, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED STUDY WITH RADIOLOGICAL AND CT EVALUATION
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2008; 90-B(8): 1039 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
Th. Karachalios, D. Giotikas, N. Roidis, L. Poultsides, K. Bargiotas, and K. N. Malizos
Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL TRIAL
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2008; 90-B(5): 584 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. P. COBB
Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2007; 89-B(8): 1130 - 1130.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

CT proves that TKA needs a tibial slope
Justin P Cobb
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 17 May 2007 [Full text]
Author's reply:
Richard J Beaver
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 25 Jun 2007 [Full text]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General