|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 5,
659-663.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18498 Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Construct validity of the Enneking score for measuring function in patients with malignant or aggressive benign tumours of the upper limbT. Wada, MD, Associate Professor1; A. Kawai, MD, Head2; K. Ihara, MD, Chief3; M. Sasaki, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; T. Sonoda, DDS, Instructor4; T. Imaeda, MD, Assistant Professor5; and T. Yamashita, MD, Professor1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Correspondence should be sent to Dr T. Wada; e-mail: twada{at}sapmed.ac.jp
We evaluated the construct validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating scale (Enneking score) as a functional measure for patients with sarcoma involving the upper limb. We compared the Enneking score by examining the correlation between two patient-derived outcome measures, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) as indicators of functional status in 40 patients with malignant or aggressive benign bone and soft-tissue tumours of the upper limb who had undergone surgical treatment. The frequency distributions were similar among the three scoring systems. As for the validity, Spearmans rank correlation coefficient of the Enneking score to the DASH questionnaire was 0.79 and that of the Enneking to the SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.38 to 0.60. Despite being a measure from the surgeons perspective, the Enneking score was shown to be a valid indicator of physical disability in patients with malignant or aggressive benign tumours of the upper limb and reflected their opinion.
|
|


