Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 8, 1019-1024.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18830  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hing, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shimmin, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hing, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shimmin, A. J.

Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

A RADIOLOGICAL STUDY

C. B. Hing, MD, FRCS(Orth), Orthopaedic Fellow1; D. A. Young, FAOrthA, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; R. E. Dalziel, FAOrthA, Orthopaedic Surgeon1; M. Bailey, MSc, PhD, Statistical Consultant2; D. L. Back, FRCSEd(Ortho), Orthopaedic Surgeon3; and A. J. Shimmin, FAOrthA, Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, 33 The Avenue, Windsor, Victoria 3181, Australia.
2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred, Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
3 Guys and St Thomas Hospital, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. Shimmin; e-mail: ashimmin{at}optusnnet.com.au

Narrowing of the femoral neck after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip has been described previously in both cemented and uncemented hip resurfacing. The natural history of narrowing of the femoral neck is unknown. We retrospectively measured the diameter of the femoral neck in a series of 163 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 163 patients up to a maximum of six years after operation to determine the extent and progression of narrowing.

There were 105 men and 58 women with a mean age of 52 years (18 to 82). At a mean follow-up of five years, the mean Harris hip score was 94.8 (47 to 100) and the mean flexion of the hip 112.5° (80° to 160°). There was some narrowing of the femoral neck in 77% (125) of the patients reviewed, and in 27.6% (45) the narrowing exceeded 10% of the diameter of the neck. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant association (chi-squared test (derived from logistic regression) p = 0.01) of narrowing with female gender and a valgus femoral neck/shaft angle. There was no significant association between the range of movement, position or size of the component or radiological lucent lines and narrowing of the neck (chi-squared test; p = 0.10 (flexion), p = 0.08 (size of femoral component), p = 0.09 (size of acetabular component), p = 0.71 (femoral component angulation), p = 0.99 (lucent lines)). There was no significant difference between the diameter of the neck at a mean of three years (2.5 to 3.5) and that at five years (4.5 to 5.5), indicating that any change in the diameter of the neck had stabilised by three years (sign rank test, p = 0.60).

We conclude that narrowing of the femoral neck which is found with the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty is in most cases associated with no adverse clinical or radiological outcome up to a maximum of six years after the initial operation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
G. N. A. Heilpern, N. N. Shah, and M. J. F. Fordyce
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A SERIES OF 110 CONSECUTIVE HIPS WITH A MINIMUM FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1137 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. T. Steffen, H. P. Pandit, J. Palan, D. J. Beard, R. Gundle, P. McLardy-Smith, D. W. Murray, and H. S. Gill
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: AN INDEPENDENT SERIES
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2008; 90-B(4): 436 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. B. Hing, D. L. Back, M. Bailey, D. A. Young, R. E. Dalziel, and A. J. Shimmin
The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: AN INDEPENDENT PROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF THE FIRST 230 HIPS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2007; 89-B(11): 1431 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General