Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 8, 1115-1121.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19129  
Copyright © 2007 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messick, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messick, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, K. A.

Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems

AN IN VITRO LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

K. J. Messick, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Chief Resident1; M. A. Miller, MS, Research Engineer1; L. A. Damron, MS, Research Engineer1; A. Race, PhD, Assistant Professor1; M. T. Clarke, FRCS, Assistant Professor1; and K. A. Mann, PhD, Professor1

1 SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, New York, 13210, USA.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor K. A. Mann; e-mail: mannk{at}upstate.edu

The role of vacuum mixing on the reduction of porosity and on the clinical performance of cemented total hip replacements remains uncertain. We have used paired femoral constructs prepared with either hand-mixed or vacuum-mixed cement in a cadaver model which simulated intra-operative conditions during cementing of the femoral component. After the cement had cured, the distribution of its porosity was determined, as was the strength of the cement-stem and cement-bone interfaces.

The overall fraction of the pore area was similar for both hand-mixed and vacuum-mixed cement (hand 6%; vacuum 5.7%; paired t-test, p = 0.187). The linear pore fractions at the interfaces were also similar for the two techniques. The pore number-density was much higher for the hand-mixed cement (paired t-test, p = 0.0013). The strength of the cement-stem interface was greater with the hand-mixed cement (paired t-test, p = 0.0005), while the strength of the cement-bone interface was not affected by the conditions of mixing (paired t-test, p = 0.275). The reduction in porosity with vacuum mixing did not affect the porosity of the mantle, but the distribution of the porosity can be affected by the technique of mixing used.




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Cement mantle optimisation
William M. Murray
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 18 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Author's reply:
Kenneth A Mann
J Bone Joint Surg Br Online, 31 Oct 2007 [Full text]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General