|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue 11,
1522-1527.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068 Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacingTHE EFFECT OF ALIGNMENT OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENTE. T. Davis, MB, ChB, MSc, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; M. Olsen, BSc, PhD, Candidate2; R. Zdero, PhD, Research Director2; J. P. Waddell, MD, FRCS(C), Professor3; and E. H. Schemitsch, MD, FRCS(C), Professor4
1 The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Mr E. T. Davis; e-mail: eddavis{at}doctors.org.uk
A total of 20 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were assigned to four alignment groups consisting of relative varus (10° and 20°) and relative valgus (10° and 20°), 75 composite femurs of two neck geometries were also used. In both the cadaver and the composite femurs, placing the component in 20° of valgus resulted in a significant increase in load to failure. Placing the component in 10° of valgus had no appreciable effect on increasing the load to failure except in the composite femurs with varus native femoral necks. Specimens in 10° of varus were significantly weaker than the neutrally-aligned specimens.
The results suggest that retention of the intact proximal femoral strength occurs at an implant angulation of This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||


142°. However, the benefit of extreme valgus alignment may be outweighed in clinical practice by the risk of superior femoral neck notching, which was avoided in this study. 
