Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue 4, 436-441.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow FrenchSpanishGermanItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzechGreek
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steffen, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steffen, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, H. S.

The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty

AN INDEPENDENT SERIES

R. T. Steffen, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow1; H. P. Pandit, FRCS(Orth), Clinical Research Fellow1; J. Palan, MRCS, Clinical Research Fellow1; D. J. Beard, DPhil, University Research Lecturer1; R. Gundle, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; P. McLardy-Smith, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; D. W. Murray, FRCS(Orth), Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery1; and H. S. Gill, DPhil, University Lecturer in Orthopaedic Engineering1

1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr H. S. Gill; e-mail: richie.gill{at}ndos.ox.ac.uk

Few independent studies have reported the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. The aim of this study was to report the five-year clinical outcome and seven-year survival of an independent series.

A total of 610 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties were performed in 532 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years (16.5 to 81.6). They were followed for between two and eight years; 107 patients (120 hips) had been followed up for more than five years. Two patients were lost to follow-up. At a minimum of five years’ follow-up, 79 of 85 hips (93%) had an excellent or good outcome according to the Harris hip score. The mean Oxford hip score was 16.1 points (SD 7.7) and the mean University of California Los Angeles activity score was 6.6 points (SD 1.9). There were no patients with definite radiological evidence of loosening or of narrowing of the femoral neck exceeding 10% of its width. There were 23 revisions (3.8%), giving an overall survival of 95% (95% confidence interval 85.3 to 99.2) at seven years. Fractured neck of femur in 12 hips was the most common indication for revision, followed by aseptic loosening in four. In three hips (three patients) (0.5%), failure was possibly related to metal debris.

Considering that these patients are young and active these results are good, and support the use of resurfacing. Further study is needed to address the early failures, particularly those related to fracture and metal debris.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
E. T. Davis, M. Olsen, R. Zdero, J. P. Waddell, and E. H. Schemitsch
Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: THE EFFECT OF ALIGNMENT OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2008; 90-B(11): 1522 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. De Haan, C. Pattyn, H. S. Gill, D. W. Murray, P. A. Campbell, and K. De Smet
Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2008; 90-B(10): 1291 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
G. N. A. Heilpern, N. N. Shah, and M. J. F. Fordyce
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A SERIES OF 110 CONSECUTIVE HIPS WITH A MINIMUM FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1137 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Khan, J.-H. Kuiper, and J. B. Richardson
The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1152 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. De Haan, P. A. Campbell, E. P. Su, and K. A. De Smet
Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: THE INFLUENCE OF MALPOSITIONING OF THE COMPONENTS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1158 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General