Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue 8, 1032-1038.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.19905  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow FrenchSpanishGermanItalianRomanianPolishRussianCzechGreek
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Iranpour, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Iranpour, F.

The anatomical tibial axis

RELIABLE ROTATIONAL ORIENTATION IN KNEE REPLACEMENT

J. P. Cobb, FRCS, MCh Oxford, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery1; H. Dixon, BSc, Medical Student1; W. Dandachli, MBBCh, MRCS, Specialist Registrar1; and F. Iranpour, MD, Clinical Research Fellow1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor J. P. Cobb; e-mail: j.cobb{at}imperial.ac.uk

The rotational alignment of the tibia is an unresolved issue in knee replacement. A poor functional outcome may be due to malrotation of the tibial component. Our aim was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in knee replacement.

CT scans of 19 knees were reconstructed in three dimensions and orientated vertically. An axial plane was identified 20 mm below the tibial spines. The centre of each tibial condyle was calculated from ten points taken round the condylar cortex. The tibial tubercle centre was also generated as the centre of the circle which best fitted eight points on the outside of the tubercle in an axial plane at the level of its most prominent point.

The derived points were identified by three observers with errors of 0.6 mm to 1 mm. The medial and lateral tibial centres were constant features (radius 24 mm (SD 3), and 22 mm (SD 3), respectively). An anatomical axis was created perpendicular to the line joining these two points. The tubercle centre was found to be 20 mm (SD 7) lateral to the centre of the medial tibial condyle. Compared with this axis, an axis perpendicular to the posterior condylar axis was internally rotated by 6° (SD 3). An axis based on the tibial tubercle and the tibial spines was also internally rotated by 5° (SD 10).

Alignment of the knee when based on this anatomical axis was more reliable than either the posterior surfaces or any axis involving the tubercle which was the least reliable landmark in the region.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Victor, D. Van Doninck, L. Labey, F. Van Glabbeek, P. Parizel, and J. Bellemans
A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: A CT-BASED KINEMATIC STUDY USING CADAVERS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2009; 91-B(5): 683 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General