|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue 1,
82-87.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21039 Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Posterolateral rotatory laxity following surgery to the head of the radiusBIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF TWO SURGICAL APPROACHESC. P. Charalambous, MBChB, MSc, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Orthopaedic Surgeon1; J. K. Stanley, MCh Orth, FRCS, FRCSE, Professor of Hand Surgery1; I. Siddique, MBChB, MRCS, Specialist Registrar1; A. Aster, FRCS, MSc, Specialist Registrar1; and O. Gagey, MD, PhD, Professor of Anatomy2
1 Department of Upper Limb Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Hall Lane, Appley Bridge, Wigan, WN6 9 EP, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Mr C. P. Charalambous; e-mail: bcharalambos{at}hotmail.com
The lateral ligament complex is the primary constraint to posterolateral rotatory laxity of the elbow, and if it is disrupted during surgery, posterolateral instability may ensue. The Wrightington approach to the head of the radius involves osteotomising the ulnar insertion of this ligament, rather than incising through it as in the classic posterolateral (Kocher) approach. In this biomechanical study of 17 human cadaver elbows, we demonstrate that the surgical approach to the head can influence posterolateral laxity, with the Wrightington approach producing less posterolateral rotatory laxity than the posterolateral approach.
|
|


