Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue 2, 201-205.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21286  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanusch, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rangan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanusch, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rangan, A.

Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND INTEGRITY OF THE REPAIR AFTER A MINI-OPEN PROCEDURE

B. C. Hanusch, MRCS, MSc, Orthopaedic Research Registrar1; L. Goodchild, MCSP, MMACP, Extended Scope2; P. Finn, MSc, Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics4; and A. Rangan, FRCS(Tr&Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon3

1 Orthopaedic Research Office, Academic Centre
2 Physiotherapist, Department of Rehabilitation
3 Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.
4 School of Health & Social Care University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Miss B. C. Hanusch; e-mail: bhanusch{at}doctors.org.uk

The aim of this study was to determine the functional outcome and rate of re-tears following mini-open repair of symptomatic large and massive tears of the rotator cuff using a two-row technique.

The 24 patients included in the study were assessed prospectively before and at a mean of 27 months (18 to 53) after surgery using the Constant and the Oxford Shoulder scores. Ultrasound examination was carried out at follow-up to determine the integrity of the repair. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a simple questionnaire.

The mean Constant score improved significantly from 36 before to 68 after operation (p < 0.0001) and the mean Oxford Shoulder score from 39 to 20 (p < 0.0001). Four of the 24 patients (17%) had a re-tear diagnosed by ultrasound. A total of 21 patients (87.5%) were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The repair remained intact in 20 patients (83%). However, the small number of re-tears (four patients) in the study did not allow sufficient analysis to show a difference in outcome in relation to the integrity of the repair.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General