|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue 3,
310-315.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21288 Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hipM. Olsen, BSc, PhD, Doctoral Researcher1; E. T. Davis, MSc, FRCS(Trauma & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon2; J. P. Waddell, MD, FRCS C, Professor of Surgery1; and E. H. Schemitsch, MD, FRCS C, Professor of Surgery, Head Division of Orthopaedic Surgery3
1 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 1W8. Correspondence should be sent to Dr E. H. Schemitsch; e-mail: schemitsche{at}smh.toronto.on.ca
We have investigated the accuracy of placement of the femoral component using imageless navigation in 100 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacings. Pre-operative templating determined the native neck-shaft angle and planned stem-shaft angle of the implant. The latter were verified post-operatively using digital anteroposterior unilateral radiographs of the hip. The mean neck-shaft angle determined before operation was 132.7° (118° to 160°). The mean planned stem-shaft angle was a relative valgus alignment of 9.7° (SD 2.6). The stem-shaft angle after operation differed from that planned by a mean of 2.8° (SD 2.0) and in 86% of cases the final angle measured within ± 5° of that planned. We had no instances of notching of the neck or varus alignment of the implant in our series. A learning curve was observed in the time taken for navigation, but not for accurate placement of the implant. Navigation in hip resurfacing may afford the surgeon a reliable and accurate method of placement of the femoral component. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||



