Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue 7, 955-961.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21466  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, A. H. W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, A. H. W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, G.

Femoral lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor

A. H. W. R. Simpson, DM(Oxon), FRCS, Professor of Orthopaedics and Trauma1; H. Shalaby, MD, FRCSEd(Tr & Orth), Lecturer in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery2; and G. Keenan, FRCS(Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 Department of Orthopaedics University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, UK.
2 Department of Orthopaedics Ain Shams University, 3b Foad Basha St, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr A. H. W. R. Simpson; e-mail: hamish.simpson{at}ed.ac.uk

Femoral lengthening using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor is a new technique. However, with intramedullary distraction the surgeon has less control over the lengthening process. Therefore, 33 femora lengthened with this device were assessed to evaluate the effect of operative variables under the surgeon’s control on the course of lengthening. The desired lengthening was achieved in 32 of 33 limbs. Problems encountered included difficulty in achieving length in eight femora (24%) and uncontrolled lengthening in seven (21%). Uncontrolled lengthening was more likely if the osteotomy was placed with less than 80 mm of the thick portion of the nail in the distal fragment (p = 0.052), and a failure to lengthen was more likely if there was over 125 mm in the distal fragment (p = 0.008). The latter problem was reduced with over-reaming by 2.5 mm to 3 mm. Previous intramedullary nailing also predisposed to uncontrolled lengthening (p = 0.042), and these patients required less reaming.

Using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor, good outcomes were obtained; problems were minimised by optimising the position of the osteotomy and the amount of over-reaming performed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C.-W. Oh, H.-R. Song, J.-W. Kim, J.-W. Choi, W.-K. Min, and B.-C. Park
Limb lengthening with a submuscular locking plate
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2009; 91-B(10): 1394 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General