Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue 7, 973-976.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21857  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kralinger, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoelz, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kralinger, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoelz, W.

The medial periosteal hinge, a key structure in fractures of the proximal humerus

A BIOMECHANICAL CADAVER STUDY OF ITS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

F. Kralinger, MD, Trauma Surgeon1; S. Unger, MD, Scientific Staff Member1; M. Wambacher, MD, Trauma Surgeon1; V. Smekal, MD, Trauma Surgeon1; and W. Schmoelz, PhD, Head of Biomechanics1

1 Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr F. Kralinger; e-mail: f.kralinger{at}uki.at

The medial periosteal hinge plays a key role in fractures of the head of the humerus, offering mechanical support during and after reduction and maintaining perfusion of the head by the vessels in the posteromedial periosteum. We have investigated the biomechanical properties of the medial periosteum in fractures of the proximal humerus using a standard model in 20 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens comparable in age, gender and bone mineral density. After creating the fracture, we displaced the humeral head medial or lateral to the shaft with controlled force until complete disruption of the posteromedial periosteum was recorded. As the quality of periosteum might be affected by age and bone quality, the results were correlated with the age and the local bone mineral density of the specimens measured with quantitative CT.

Periosteal rupture started at a mean displacement of 2.96 mm (SD 2.92) with a mean load of 100.9 N (SD 47.1). The mean maximum load of 111.4 N (SD 42.5) was reached at a mean displacement of 4.9 mm (SD 4.2). The periosteum was completely ruptured at a mean displacement of 34.4 mm (SD 11.1). There was no significant difference in the mean distance to complete rupture for medial (mean 35.8 mm (SD 13.8)) or lateral (mean 33.0 mm (SD 8.2)) displacement (p = 0.589).

The mean bone mineral density was 0.111 g/cm3 (SD 0.035). A statistically significant but low correlation between bone mineral density and the maximum load uptake (r = 0.475, p = 0.034) was observed.

This study showed that the posteromedial hinge is a mechanical structure capable of providing support for percutaneous reduction and stabilisation of a fracture by ligamentotaxis. Periosteal rupture started at a mean of about 3 mm and was completed by a mean displacement of just under 35 mm. The microvascular situation of the rupturing periosteum cannot be investigated with the current model.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General