Anil Agarwal M.S. (Ortho.), CONSULTANT ORTHOPAEDICIAN , Rachna Agarwal
Send letter to journal:
Re: Immune status of patients and diagnostic difficulties in infected implants
rachna_anila{at}yahoo.co.in Anil Agarwal M.S. (Ortho.), et al.
|
Sir,
We enjoyed reading this article.
Several participants in the study were elderly and might have been suffering from
multiple chronic ailments (e.g. diabetes); others were rheumatoid and
might have been taking immuno-suppressive drugs or steroids. The immune
response to infection may be decreased or altered if the person is not
immuno-competent. Therefore, the immuno-competency of the patients should
also be addressed in the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, the
aspiration criteria, used in the definition of an infected implant, may not
always be suggestive of deep infection as infection confined to
superficial planes can mimic a positive aspirate and thus a diagnostic
dilemma always remains.
The authors do not differentiate between the
radiological criteria for implant stability in internal fixation devices
and arthroplasties. Peri-prosthetic infection by Mycobacterium
tuberculosis sometimes has a similar pattern as that
described by Trebse et al in their article.1,2 We believe that in
suspicious cases, tuberculosis should always be included in the differential
diagnosis.
A. AGARWAL
R. AGARWAL
Delhi, India.
1. Spinner RJ, Sexton DJ, Goldner RD, Levin LS. Periprosthetic infections
due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with no prior history of
tuberculosis. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:217-22.
2. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR. Prosthetic
joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a case series and
review of the literature. Am J Orthop 1998;27:219-27. |