Sir,
I read this article with great interest. The
authors have found a significant incidence of secondary avascular necrosis in this series (12 out of 377, 3.2%). I have noticed from the article that the authors have been using a posterior approach for hip resurfacing. In
recent literature most authors seem to be using a similar posterior approach with anterior1 or posterior capsulotomy.2
Hip resurfacing needs an adequate exposure while respecting the local
biology. The Ganz approach3 seems to provide this adequately. This exposure
protects in the medial circumflex femoral artery, which supplies the femoral head. My consultant, Mr Glynne Andrew uses this approach for hip resurfacing and I was indeed surprised to find that most authors are using a standard
posterior approach.
Thank you
Yours truly
Harish Kurup, Specialist Registrar
Ysbyty Gwynedd,
Bangor, North Wales LL57 2PW.
References:
1. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
2. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
3. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:1119-24.