Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In

Electronic Letters to:

Hip:
P. Mattsson, A. Alberts, G. Dahlberg, M. Sohlman, H. C. Hyldahl, and S. Larsson
Resorbable cement for the augmentation of internally-fixed unstable trochanteric fractures: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED MULTICENTRE STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87-B: 1203-1209 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Response to Mr Kharwadkar
Production Department   (20 October 2005)
[Read eLetter] Letter from Mr Kharwadkar
Nikhil Kharwadkar   (14 October 2005)

Response to Mr Kharwadkar 20 October 2005
Previous eLetter  Top
Production Department

Send letter to journal:
Re: Response to Mr Kharwadkar

production{at}jbjs.org.uk Production Department

The authors have chosen not to respond to this letter.
Letter from Mr Kharwadkar 14 October 2005
 Next eLetter Top
Nikhil Kharwadkar,
SpR
Yorkshire Deanery

Send letter to journal:
Re: Letter from Mr Kharwadkar

nkharwadkar{at}hotmail.com Nikhil Kharwadkar

Sir,

I read this article with interest. Osteoconductive materials like calcium phosphate cement have been shown to be effective in the treatment of defects in metaphyseal bone in association with some fractures, notably in the distal radius, the tibial plateau and the calcaneum.1 The use of calcium phosphate cement for unstable trochanteric fractures has provided a modest reduction in pain and a slight improvement in quality of life during the course of healing. However, the authors have not commented on improved stability of the fixation with the use of calcium phosphate cement. Interestingly, two fractures in the augumented group had not healed completely on the radiograph at six months and were therefore classified as nonunion. The authors have also reported two cases of loosening of the plate due to breakage and pulling out of screws by six months in the augumented group. Calcium phosphate cement provides a structural support to the adjacent bone and therefore acts as an adjunct to limit the amount of fixation.1 Deep infection may have caused the failure of fixation in these two cases. The authors have not mentioned the incidence of superficial or deep infection for both groups.

N. KHARWADKAR, MRCS, MS
Yorkshire Deanery,
Leeds, UK.

1. Keating JF, McQueen MM. Substitutes for autologous bone graft in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;82-B:3-8.

(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General