Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In

Electronic Letters to:

Hip:
H. Lindahl, H. Malchau, A. Odén, and G. Garellick
Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88-B: 26-30 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur
Yousaf R Shah, Turab A. Syed, Zahid Saeed, Zulfiqar Sadiq   (8 March 2006)

Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur 8 March 2006
  Top
Yousaf R Shah,
Trust Registrar Trauma and Orthopaedics
Milton Keynes General Hospital., Milton Keynes, UK,
Turab A. Syed, Zahid Saeed, Zulfiqar Sadiq

Send letter to journal:
Re: Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur

orthoresearch{at}gmail.com Yousaf R Shah, et al.

Sir,

We read this article with interest. The purpose of the study was to identify the factors causing high failure rate of total hip replacement revision.

One of these was the surgeons’ false impression of stability of the femoral stem, thus classifying Vancouver type B2 as B1. They subsequently treated the fracture with plate fixation only and not revision. It would be interesting to know what radiological criterion was used pre-operatively to classify the stability of the stem.1 If the decision was coupled with intra-operative assessment, what factors were considered?

The data dates back to 1979, since when a number of modifications2 have taken place, both in cementing techniques and implant design (stems and plates). Therefore, it raises the question of any correlation of implant failure with these factors. Was there any association between failure and the site of plate/s placement?

Lastly, what was the post-operative weight bearing status of the patients and was there any correlation between this and failure of revision?

Y.R. Shah,
T.A. Syed,
Z. Saeed,
Z. Sadiq,
Trauma and Orthopaedics,
Milton Keynes General Hospital,
Milton Keynes, UK.

1. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;141:17–27.
2. McCaskie AW, Gregg PJ. Femoral cementing technique: current trends and future developments. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:176-7.

(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General