Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In

Electronic Letters to:

Spine:
M. J. Shelly, J. S. Butler, M. Timlin, M. G. Walsh, A. R. Poynton, and J. M. O’Byrne
Spinal injuries in Irish rugby: A TEN-YEAR REVIEW
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88-B: 771-775 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Spinal injuries due to scrum engagement in Australian rugby
Paul T Haylen   (15 September 2006)
[Read eLetter] Law change in rugby after spinal injury
Paul D Hamilton, Grice J, Yousaf S.   (21 June 2006)

Spinal injuries due to scrum engagement in Australian rugby 15 September 2006
Previous eLetter  Top
Paul T Haylen,
Civil Engineer
Individual

Send letter to journal:
Re: Spinal injuries due to scrum engagement in Australian rugby

phaylen{at}evanspeck.com Paul T Haylen

Sir,

I read this article with interest, and while I wholeheartedly agree with the recommendations by the authors, I would like to clarify the point raised about spinal injuries due to scrum-engagement in Australian rugby.

The authors refer to rule changes in the mid 1980s that resulted in a significant reduction in the number of spinal injuries due to scrum- engagement in Australia. One of the main drivers of this reduction was the introduction of the 'crouch-touch-pause-engage' sequence during scrum engagement to reduce the momentum of the forward packs.1 These changes were implemented by the Australian Rugby Union (ARU) for 'under-19' players in 1985. Variations of these changes were implemented by senior players in Australia in 1988 and then internationally in 1990.

However, the above reduction in scrum-engagement injuries has been derived by comparing the results of two Australian studies – the first between 1975 and 1985,2 and the second between 1986 and 1996.3 A third, more recent study covering the period 1997 to 20024 was published in the Medical Journal of Australia last year.

Unfortunately, this latest Australian study concludes that “there has been a gradual return to a forceful scrum engagement” in Australia. In this study, six of the seven injuries in the scrum occurred during engagement. The paper also highlights the recent success achieved in rugby league in Australia in relation to scrum injuries. Since 1996, when scrums stopped being contested in this sport, there were no scrum injuries in the study period.

Another recent study5 that examines spinal cord injuries in rugby in the Australian state (or province) of New South Wales between 1986 and 2003, has noted “a recent upwards tendency” for cervical spinal cord injury rates in rugby union, although the authors of this study cannot say whether this is a chance fluctuation or an emerging trend.

These two recent studies in Australia reinforce the need for properly controlled studies and centralised registers for spinal injuries in rugby union, on both national and international levels, so that trends can be identified and changes implemented.

P.T. Haylen, BE Civil(Hons), MBA,
Sydney, Australia.

1. Haylen PT. Spinal injuries in rugby union, 1970-2003: lessons and responsibilities. Med J Aust 2004;181:48-50.
2. Taylor TKF, Coolican MRJ. Spinal-cord injuries in Australian footballers, 1960-1985. Med J Aust 1987;147:112-8.
3. Spinecare Foundation and the Australian Spinal Cord Injury Units. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:493-9.
4. Carmody DJ, Taylor TKF, Parker DA, Coolican MRJ, Cumming RG. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers 1997-2002. Med J Aust 2005;182:561-4.
5. Berry JG, Harrison JE, Yeo JD, Cripps RA, Stephenson SCR. Cervical spinal cord injury in rugby union and rugby league: are incidence rates declining in NSW? ANZ J Public Health 2006;30:268-74.

Law change in rugby after spinal injury 21 June 2006
 Next eLetter Top
Paul D Hamilton,
Specialist Registrar
Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton , BN2 5BE,
Grice J, Yousaf S.

Send letter to journal:
Re: Law change in rugby after spinal injury

pauldhamilton{at}gmail.com Paul D Hamilton, et al.

Sir,

Reading the paper by Shelly et al, we were surprised by the result that most of the injuries were not as a result of the scrum. Contrary to recent opinion in the BMJ1 and subsequent reports in the popular press2 calling for contested scrums to be banned, this paper indicates that spinal injuries with cord deficit are more common in the tackle situation rather than in the scrum (at least in Ireland). This, we believe, further supports the point made for a registry of serious injuries to be set up, so that action and reviews into the laws of the game are based on trends in spinal injury and not on perceived risks raised in the popular press.

P.D. Hamilton, SpR,
J. Grice,
S. Yousaf,
Royal Sussex County Hospital,
Brighton, UK.

1. Bourke JB. Rugby union should ban contested scrums. BMJ 2006;332:1281.
2. Inverdale J. Doctor sparks fierce debate with call to scrap the scrum. The Daily Telegraph June 7, 2006. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?xml=/sport/2006/06/07/srinve07.xml (accessed 9/6/6)

(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General